QUESTION: Our Medical Staff Bylaws require current board certification in the area in which an individual wants to practice. Does that mean that recertification and/or maintenance of certification is required?
ANSWER: Board certification (and particularly recertification and maintenance of certification) have become very contentious issues in recent years. Not a week goes by that we don’t hear about some controversy surrounding board certification (e.g., state laws prohibiting it as a factor to be considered for health plan participation, issues with applicants who want alternative boards to be accepted by the hospital and its medical staff). Some argue that certification is an industry-acknowledged stamp of approval with respect to basic competence. Others argue that recertification and maintenance of certification have become overly bureaucratic, money-making machines and no longer serve as an indicator of quality. We cannot say who is right. But, due to the level of contention surrounding this issue, we will repeat our oft-given advice: be clear in the Bylaws, Credentials Policy, privileging forms and delineation documents, and other relevant policies. Clarity puts everyone on the same page, lets practitioners know what to expect, and prevents disputes.
In your case, the word “current” has been added to the Bylaws language to clarify the requirements for board certification. From a plain-language standpoint, the Bylaws cannot be read to require only past certification which has now lapsed – since that would make the word “current” superfluous. It is pretty clear that your Bylaws do, in fact, require that an individual’s board certification be kept up to date. As you know, different boards require different things of different people in order for them to stay “current.” Some lucky folks from days gone by were granted lifetime board certification and they will satisfy any requirements for “current” board certification for their entire careers. Other individuals have time-limited certification and must either recertify, comply with maintenance of certification requirements, or both in order to remain “current.” To ensure that there are no misunderstandings, if a hospital and its medical staff decide that recertification and maintenance of certification will be required, we recommend that the Bylaws language not only use terminology referring to “current” certification but also specifically note that recertification and maintenance of certification are required, if required by the applicable boards.
Further, because issues surrounding board certification continue to be contentious, we recommend that you consult with counsel when revising the Bylaws or privileging forms to address such issues and that you take care to address not just recertification and maintenance of certification, but also:
- which boards are acceptable for meeting the requirements;
- whether subspecialty certification is required;
- whether it is required to be certified in only one specialty or subspecialty, in those cases where the practitioner seeks privileges in more than one specialty at the hospital; and
- what happens if a practitioner fails to satisfy the relevant board certification, recertification, or maintenance of certification requirements (e.g., automatic relinquishment of privileges upon notice? ineligibility for reappointment?)