Holy Cross Hosp. v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 
  No. 01 C 1505 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2002) 
   A
  hospital sued a participating provider organization ("PPO") that
   it had a contract with, in which the hospital provided health care services
   to PPO members at discounted rates. The hospital claimed that the contract
  expired  in 1996, and that the PPO was not entitled to any discounts subsequent
  to that  date. The PPO moved for summary judgment, claiming that it was entitled
  to the  discounts because there was a valid contract in place that included
  the discounts  because the hospital ratified the contract.
 A
  hospital sued a participating provider organization ("PPO") that
   it had a contract with, in which the hospital provided health care services
   to PPO members at discounted rates. The hospital claimed that the contract
  expired  in 1996, and that the PPO was not entitled to any discounts subsequent
  to that  date. The PPO moved for summary judgment, claiming that it was entitled
  to the  discounts because there was a valid contract in place that included
  the discounts  because the hospital ratified the contract.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that, although there was a valid contract in place, the contract did not contain a provision regarding the rates that would be charged, and denied the summary judgment motion.